Patients' and carers' perception of needs in a Polish sample.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of patients' needs is an essential element of psychiatric health care planning and evaluation. Not much interest has been paid to the study of psychiatric patients' needs in Poland so far. AIMS: To assess the relation between inpatients' and their key carers' perception of needs in a Polish sample. METHODS: Out of 324 inpatients invited to take part in the study, 60 sets were finally included. Patients and their carers were examined by means of CANSAS to rate patients' and carers' perception of needs. RESULTS: The mean number of general needs indicated by patients themselves was 7.11 (± 2.98), and those indicated by carers equalled 9.53 (± 3.92). The more unmet needs identified by the patient, the more met and general needs of the patient identified by their carer (r = .27, p = .03; r = .38, p = .02, respectively). The more general needs perceived by the patient themself, the higher the indicator of unmet and general needs scored by their carer (r = .32, p = .01; r = .39, p = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between the inpatients' and their carers' perception of needs. Patients' perspective should serve as a high priority in developing treatment plans.

Money matters: does the reimbursement policy for second generation antipsychotics influence the number of recorded schizophrenia patients and the burden of stigmatization?

PURPOSE: In Poland, non-compliance with the reimbursement policy for second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) manifested in prescribing SGA for patients with psychotic disorders other than schizophrenia may result in serious financial penalties. In this study, we aimed at investigating whether the implementation of the reimbursement policy for SGA contributed to increasing the number of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia relatively to the number of patients with a diagnosis of other psychotic disorders in outpatient clinics. METHODS: We analyzed data from Yearbooks of Mental Health that were published by the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland in the years 1989­2009 registering the number of patients treated for various mental disorders in public facilities in Poland. Temporal trend analysis of the annual number of patients with a diagnosis of psychotic disorders, who were treated at outpatient clinics, was performed. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant increase in the total number of recorded schizophrenia patients treated at outpatient clinics, as well as in the number of patients treated for the first time at outpatient clinics for schizophrenia. These changes overlap with the implementation of the reimbursement policy for SGA. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the restricted reimbursement policy for SGA altered the diagnosing process in Poland. It seems that these alterations may have serious social consequences. Given that a diagnosis of schizophrenia is more stigmatizing than a diagnosis of other psychotic disorders, it might be assumed that schizophrenia over-diagnosing, possibly due to reimbursement reasons, add to the enormous burden associated with stigmatization.

European studies on the prevalence of dementia in the elderly: time for a step towards a methodological consensus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to discuss methodological limitations in studies on the prevalence of dementia across European countries with particular attention to post-EURODEM studies. METHODS: Two people independently focused on an iterative literature search for studies published in the years 2000-2012 using the following keywords: 'dementia', 'Alzheimer', 'incidence', 'prevalence' that were cross-linked with names of European countries. After that, the results obtained were compared and publications in English were included in a subsequent analysis. RESULTS: We included 26 studies published in the years 2000-2012. The majority of epidemiological studies come from Spain and Italy. The past decade has not provided prevalence rates from a considerable number of countries. There is also a lack of nationwide surveys on the prevalence of dementia. Predominantly, epidemiological studies on the prevalence of dementia follow a two-stage approach that consists of a screening phase and a subsequent confirmation of dementia. However, several differences, particularly with regard to the neuropsychological instruments used, still exist and contribute to inconsistent prevalence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although the EURODEM study was a milestone in the epidemiology of dementia in Europe and provided several future directions for research, methodological limitations are apparent in a number of European studies on the prevalence of dementia and require particular attention. In particular, a variety of diagnostic instruments requires unification for future studies. On the other hand, given the lack of epidemiological studies from a number of countries and the increasing prevalence of dementia, the need for population-based surveys should be emphasized.

[Caregiving consequences in mental disorders--definitions and instruments of assessment]. / Konsekwencje opieki nad pacjentem z zaburzeniem psychicznym--definicje i narzedzia oceny.

Severe mental illnesses have far-reaching consequences for both patients and their relatives. This paper reviews literature on the measures of caregiving consequences. Authors provide a condensed knowledge and research results in the area of caregiving consequences, especially both subjective and objective caregivers' burden. The consequences of care apply to carers' social and leisure activities, financial status, health condition. The burden of care has three fundamental causes: the reorganisation of mental health services, a social isolation of patients and their families and the lack of systemic support for caregivers. The problem of caregiving consequences has been investigated in several studies. In order to identify factors, which have impact on caregiver distress, a variety instruments have been developed. This paper focuses on questionnaires useful for the systematic assessment of both objective and subjective burden: Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ), Perceived Family Burden Scale (PFBS), Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale (ZCBS), Experience of Caregiving Inventory (ECI), Family Problems Questionnaire (FPQ). The mentioned instruments proved to be a reliable instrument for measuring caregiver consequences in mental healthcare.